|
CCD Temperature Variability And Dark Current Correction
|
|
|
|
An important step in CCD image calibration is the removal of the thermal
signature commonly known as "dark count". An accurate measurement of the
dark count in a CCD image cannot be made from the image itself.
To determine the dark count, a time exposure is taken with the camera
shutter closed to produce an image containing the thermal signature of the CCD
chip. This "dark frame" is then subtracted from the "normal" data image of same
exposure to remove the thermal signature present in the data image.
Dark count is the product of a "dark current", or rate per second of electrons
created by the CCD, and the exposure time in seconds. Thus the amount of dark
count present in a CCD image depends on the temperature of the CCD chip.
In fact, the dark current is slightly different for each pixel
of the CCD. The dark current varies with temperature by a complex mathematical
relationship. To remove the thermal signature, a dark frame must accurately
estimate the dark count unique to each pixel of the image.
If the temperature of the CCD when the dark frame is taken is different from
the temperature of the CCD chip when the normal light frame is taken, then the
wrong amount of dark count is removed, giving a poor correction for the thermal
signature of the CCD. It is not just an issue of how the CCD temperature
fluctuates over a timescale of minutes but, more critically, the CCD
temperature now compared with 2 hours ago when dark frames were taken.
The importance of temperature stability is two fold:
-
The dark current distribution has more than 1 population of values, each with
its own temperature scaling law. The hotter populations, while comprising at
most a few percent of the total, are even more sensitive to temperature
variations than the results shown here. They subtract very poorly when
temperature variations are present, leaving a residual sprinkling of bright
and dark points over the image.
-
Proper flat field correction depends upon accurate dark count removal.
An error in the dark count reveals itself as a "convex" or "concave"
appearing image instead of a constant one after flat field correction.
Longer exposure times, employed in astronomy and other low light imaging
applications, exacerbate the variations in dark count. This Tech Note shows
how temperature differences between the dark frame and light frame affect
the dark count correction in CCD data.
|
|
|
|
Numerical Models
|
The graphs below show the results of numeric models
that calculate the dark count as a function of CCD temperature. Only the
majority population of pixels is considered. The minority populations having 5,
10, 50, or more times the average dark current are not considered. Calculations
were made for a Kodak KAF-0400 CCD, which has 9 micron pixels, and the SITe
Si-502a CCD, which has 24 micron pixels. The Kodak models assumed a simple power
law relationship with a "doubling temperature" of 5.8C. For the SITe CCD, the
dark current was calculated using an exact mathematical expression that is
combination of a power law and other terms. The SITe calculations per
pixel were scaled down by a factor of 7.11 times to correct its larger pixel
area to that of the Kodak CCD. The scaled SITe results are more directly
applicable to the Kodak results, since the important quantity is not the amount
of dark count per pixel, but rather the amount of dark current per unit area
under an image detail appearing in the CCD frame.
The top figure below shows the model calculations for the Kodak KAF-0400 CCD.
The second figure shows model calculations for the SITe Si-502a CCD chip
scaled to 9 micron pixels. The SITe chip clearly has larger dark current at
a given temperature, so it also has more sensitivity to temperature variations.
Each graph below has two curves that define the dark current when the CCD is
0.2C warmer than average and 0.2C cooler than average. The dark count is given
in units of electrons (e-). A point on a red curve indicates that the dark
count is higher by that number of e- if the CCD temperature is 0.2C warmer
than expected. The blue curves handle the converse case for the CCD being 0.2C
colder than expected. The curves show the amount of error that would result
from subtracting a dark frame taken 0.2C warmer or cooler than the CCD when
the light exposure was taken. The difference 0.2C is based on the industry
standard adoption of 0.1C rms temperature variation as a performance spec
for CCD cameras. Therefore, one might find that the dark frame was taken when
the CCD was 0.1C warmer than average, and the data frame was taken when the
CCD was 0.1C cooler than average, creating a 0.2C difference in dark count.
The curvature in these relationships results from the power law relationship
between dark current and temperature.
To first order, the results given here can be applied to larger temperature
variations by simply scaling the result by the temperature difference.
For example, to estimate the effect of 2.0C difference, multiply the
graphical value by 2.0 / 0.2 = 10 times.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Discussion
|
Comparing the two models shows some interesting results. Most obvious is
the difference in the magnitude of the dark count error for the two different
chips. The SITe CCD is optimized differently than the Kodak CCD, and this
results in a higher dark current at a given temperature. Higher dark current
is not a "defect" of the SITe chip design, but it simply means that the chip
must be operated cooler than a Kodak chip to give comparable dark current.
Both are excellent CCD's in their niche of operation. The CCD temperature must
also be very stable if good correction of the thermal signature is to be attained.
CCD temperature controllers are only so good, and they cannot maintain the
temperature at a perfectly constant level. The question then is how stable is
"stable enough". Since the error decreases as the dark current decreases,
it is obvious why CCD's are cooled to cryogenic temperatures for making the
most critical measurements. There is always going to be variation in the CCD
temperature during an imaging session---the issue is the amount of "damage"
done by a given level of stability. Clearly, the colder the CCD, the
better.
Clearly, the best image calibration is achieved when there is zero difference
in CCD temperature when data frames and dark frames are taken. However, in the
real world, CCD cameras differ in the accuracy and stability of their temperature
control systems. Bear in mind that the criterion "0.1C rms" is a 1-sigma
statistical quantity. This does not mean that the CCD temperature varies within
limits of +-0.1C, but that 68% of the time the temperature held is within 0.1
degree of the nominal value and 95% of the time it is within 2-sigmas, or
0.2C of the nominal value. But even tight temperature control doesn't guarantee
that the temperature is accurately measured. Even more important is not just
that the temperature control believes it is stable within a fraction
of a degree, but that the temperature controller accurately measures the actual
CCD temperature. To do this with thermoelectrically cooled cameras, a simple
temperature control circuit measures temperature relative to an ambient
temperature sample. In a laboratory environment, where the ambient room
temperature is stable, temperature control is not a complex problem.
In applications such as astronomy, in which the camera is subjected to the
changing temperature of the night, a more sophisticated control loop is
needed because it must compensate for the variation in ambient temperature
near the camera. The most critical CCD work requires that both concerns be
satisfied: 1) The CCD temperature be accurately measured by the controller and,
2) the temperature remain stable over time. Both problems are partially compensated
simply by cooling the CCD as much as possible to minimize both the dark current
and its variation.
|
|
|
Copyright © 1999. Mirametrics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
| Previous Mirametrics Article
|
Next Mirametrics Article |
|
|
Opticstar Showroom
|
|
Opening Hours
|
|
updated: 2nd January 2013
|
 |
Day Opening Hours
Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm
Saturday 10am - 2pm
Sunday CLOSED
We are closed on Sundays and public holidays.
|
|
|
| more |
|
Willmann Bell
|
|
Books for Astronomy
|
|
updated: 15th May 2012
|
 |
|
Acclaimed books from Willmann Bell...
|
|
|
| more |
|
Opticstar News
|
|
Imaging Brochure
|
|
posted: 17th August 2012
|
 |
|
Download the Opticstar imaging catalogue here.
|
|
|
| more |
|
Sample Images
|
|
Opticstar PL-130M CoolAir
|
|
posted: 10th February 2009
|
 |
|
An impressive 9.4 megapixel mosaic of the Moon by Herwig Sulzbacher with
the Opticstar PL-130M.
|
|
|
|
Articles
|
|
Pixel Response Effects On CCD Gain Calibration
|
 |
|
The gain of a CCD camera is the conversion between...
|
|
|
| more |
|
A&M 152mm f/8 Review
|
|
"Fantastic Performance" "Beauty of a Ferrari"
|
|
updated: 25th March 2009
|
 |
|
Read the latest review about the A&M 152mm f/8 A&M/TMB on
Cloudy Nights.
According to the review this telescope combines the "beauty of a Ferrari" with
"fantastic performance". The review also states that "the manufacturer's claims are valid".
|
|
|
|
Feedback
|
|
We want to hear your comments.
|
|
|
| contact |
|
Online Shopping
|
|
Credit & Debit Cards
|
|
updated: 21st February 2012
|
 |
We accept all the credit and debit cards shown above. Online payments are
cleared by Barclays. Online payment integration by Worldpay. Please read our
Terms & Conditions
|
|
|
|
